Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Junichi Saito <j saito wanadoo fr>
- cc: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>, "Sergey I. Panov" <sipan mit edu>, GNOME mailing list <gnome-list gnome org>, "recipient.list.not.shown": ;
- Subject: Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 12:54:32 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Junichi Saito wrote:
> To: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Is it a proper CVS dep tree?
> From: Junichi Saito <j.saito@wanadoo.fr>
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> >glib
> > |
> > V
> >gtk+ gnome-xml imlib gtk-engines
> > |________________________________________ | | |
> > | | | | | | | |
> > V V V V V V | V
> >ORBit libgtop gnome-http guile-core libgtop gnome-dom | (optional)
> > | | | | | | |
> > |______|__________|__________|__________|________|_________|
> > |
>
> Dose guile-core depend on glib and gtk+ ? I usually compile it before
> them, not that glib and gtk+ depend on guile-core, though.
Yes, correct - guile does not depend on any gnome thing.and the first
thing in this tree that depeds on guile is gnome-guile.
Martin
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Baulig - Angewandte Mathematik - Universitaet Trier
martin@home-of-linux.org, http://www.home-of-linux.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]