Re: GNOME Desktop.
- From: bratsche dfw net
- To: Rok Papez <rok slo net>
- cc: "gnome-list gnome org" <gnome-list gnome org>, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: GNOME Desktop.
- Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 12:52:26 -0500 (EST)
This is very strange. I've installed KDE 1.0 in the past and it seemed
extremely usable to me. It was not nearly as slow as either NT or OS/2,
although I didn't take the time to mess around with every feature of it
either.
What little I do know regarding GNOME vs. KDE in speed in regarding the
CORBA programs. KDE uses a program called mico, which is what GNOME used
for awhile before it was decided that it would potentially speed things up
by writing a C-based ORB, and hence sprung ORBit.
Regardless of that, I still maintain my claim that KDE is not unusably
slow. You may have installed it incorrectly, or you may not have a very
high- (or even middle-) end machine. I use a 233mhz K6 with 64 megs of
memory, which seems to be fairly middle-of-the-road these days.
Read www.gnome.org to see what window managers currently support GNOME. I
know that Enlightenment is the only one that is completely up-to-date with
GNOME, and icewm and WindowMaker are also attempting to achieve
GNOME-compliance.
Best regards,
Cody
On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Rok Papez wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I have tried installing the KDE; installation was easy
> (including recompile); but it is SLOW. Slower than
> Windows NT/98 and much slower than OS/2 PM/WPS <- this
> thing has SOM behind so I'm clueless what they did to
> the desktop to make it THAT slow. I think KDE Beta2 was
> faster then KDE 1.0. :((.
>
> Whatever you guys do to GNOME. Make it *usable*, *fast*
> and after all that, *good looking*.
>
> Then I tried installing GNOME (with recompile) and
> it failed during compilation (RH5.2). Not to mention
> the bad installation documentation :), where error
> messages were giving me the clues what to do next
> (No I did not see www.gnome.org as a friend brought
> me the latest GNOME on a ZIP).
>
> So I ended up installing the binaries that were on my
> RH5.2 cd. GNOME now runs without problems.
> The question is:
> KDE has its own desktop (window manager); what window
> manager is most GNOME aware. I'd like to have a KDE
> desktop a la GNOME ;-))). (I liked KDE desktop, just
> if it was faster :().
>
> Enlightment?
> AfterStep?
>
>
>
> best regards,
> Rok Papez.
>
> Student at Faculty of Computer and Information Science,
> University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]