Re: Harmony + GNOME (Was: Re: C++)
- From: Andreas Kostyrka <andreas rainbow studorg tuwien ac at>
- To: Joel Dillon <emily cornholio new ox ac uk>
- cc: Toshio Kuratomi <badger prtr-13 ucsc edu>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Harmony + GNOME (Was: Re: C++)
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:51:46 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Joel Dillon wrote:
> Well, at this stage I would just like to know what the view of the Gnome
> people is on non-gtk widget sets and Gnome. So I'd like either for noone
> to raise any objections, or for a few people to object but for someone
> important in Gnome to say that other widget sets than gtk can be used if
> they fit the look and feel guidelines.
There are pros and cons:
+ Actually, GNOME as such is much about choice. So having the different
toolkit would be even more liberating, right?
- Different look and feel. It's really difficult to have the same look and
feel. (But in theory doable. Curious question: Why don't the Harmony
people GTK/GDK as underlying ``drawing engine''? It's more work,
etc., but the benefits are probably greater.)
- protocol compliance. DnD, CORBA, color sharing, etc.
Again difficult but doable.
- And there is always the problem of upgrades: All GTK apps look
different, and the user sees that a certain app doesn't look and feel
the same. In basic, the ``compatible'' toolkit authors had to play
constant catch up.
- Themes: ``Ok, now I have this cool 3D rotating button theme. Why don't
they work with this app?''
I understand that themes as such are a problem for any custom
widget writer, but with GTK at least the standard elements
change at the same time.
Andreas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]