Re: Ditching CORBA, again?



Mosfet wrote:

> Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > > I remember the discussions that took place back then, and the key arguments
> > > against OpenParts where:
> >
> > This was not the reasons we started Bonobo.
> >
> > Sadly, as any user of OpenParts can tell you, OpenParts is
> > over-complex and lacks a number of features and simplicity found in
> > other compound document systems.
> >
> > So, I designed and implemented the origina Bonobo: to be a system
> > people would be confortable writting applications with.
> >
>
> Well, first of all OP is not the "document system", the K Object Model is.
> Second of all, considering there is almost a quarter of a million lines of code
> currently written to use KOM evidently people aren't finding it all too
> difficult.
>
> But oh well, since you don't seem to know the difference between OpenParts and
> KOM I doubt you seriously looked at either.
>
> BTW: With KOM you can create a full embedded Konq part with communication in ~ 3
> lines now ;-)
>

Ugh, now he has me screwed up :P With the new parts mechanism ;-)

>
> >
> > best wishes,
> > Miguel.
> >
> > --
> >         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> >          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-kde-list-request@gnome.org with
> >                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
> --
> Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
> mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
> mosfet@kde.org
> mosfet@jorsm.com
>
> --
>         FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>          To unsubscribe: mail gnome-kde-list-request@gnome.org with
>                        "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

--
Daniel M. Duley - Unix developer & sys admin.
mosfet@mandrakesoft.com
mosfet@kde.org
mosfet@jorsm.com





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]