Re: Help with Article Wishlists

[Ken VanDine <ken vandine org>]

Someone should write about gobject introspection :)

Not me... but that is a topic I really want to read about.

--Ken

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me> wrote:
> We mentioned inthe meeting that you were missed. :-)
>
> sri
>
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Claus Schwarm <clschwarm googlemail com> wrote:
>> When I created the ArticleWishlist page, the categories were meant to serve
>> as general points that often create valuable news. Stuff to watch out for,
>> if you like.
>>
>> In this spirit, GNOME 3.0 could be considered an "event" to report about,
>> including previews, preparation, etc. What about the next GUADEC?
>> Application reviews are part of "functionality". Likewise, while an article
>> about GTK-Perl might have become irrelevant today, but it's still useful as
>> an example to look for trends to report about. Replace GTK-Perl with C#/Mono
>> or Vala and you get a more up-to.date article idea.
>>
>> I'm not saying it's the best way to organize it. Maybe, it's too abstract.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Claus
>>
>> P.S.: Good to see people working on a new edition. Sorry I missed that IRC
>> meeting.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Paul Cutler <pcutler foresightlinux org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I spent a few minutes trying to clean up the Article Wishlist wiki
>>> page on lgo (http://live.gnome.org/GnomeJournal/ArticleWishlist)
>>>
>>> I added two sections at the top - GNOME 3.0, and Applications Reviews.
>>>  Sri and I were brainstorming some applications new to GNOME last
>>> week, and I added those there.
>>>
>>> Other than some minor additions, everything below that is legacy
>>> ideas.  For those that have been with the GJ team longer than I have,
>>> can you browse through the list and see what is still relevant?  I'm
>>> sure that most of the article ideas are, but I thought this might be a
>>> good chance to do some spring cleaning, especially with our hopes of
>>> recruiting new team members, and this is one of the first pages they
>>> will take a look at.
>>>
>>> Lastly, is there a better way to organize this information?
>>>
>>> Other pages on GJ that I could use some help with reviewing:
>>>
>>> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeJournal/PlaceForNewIdeas : What other new
>>> ideas might we have in marketing GJ?  Are these ideas still relevant?
>>>
>>> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeJournal/ArticleSubmissionQueue : I'm going
>>> to work on this page as it hasn't been updated since 2007 with
>>> information around the next release, in addition to some work I'm
>>> trying to do around a release calendar.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnome-journal-list mailing list
>>> Gnome-journal-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-journal-list
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnome-journal-list mailing list
>> Gnome-journal-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-journal-list
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Sriram Ramkrishna (sri *((&)aracnet.com)
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-journal-list mailing list
> Gnome-journal-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-journal-list
>