Re: Dates article..

[Jim Hodapp <james hodapp gmail com>]

Ahh, let's include neither then. That's your call in this case  
jwilliams.

Jim

On Feb 28, 2007, at 5:18 PM, John Williams wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 13:59 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > Let's not add this then. Better to have it be expanded.  Otherwise we
> > would miss out on the opportunity to have a much better presentation
> > on Dates than this one.  We can replace it with Davyd's linuxconf
> > article.
> Davyd's "article" is a bare-bones conference report.  If we had a
> section "Conference Reports" or similar, it would be good.  But I  
> don't
> think it's main article material.
>
> For these reasons, could we include the Dates article, or neither?   
> Then
> we could get the release out the door.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-journal-list mailing list
> Gnome-journal-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-journal-list