Re: Dates article..

[John Williams <john williams lists gmail com>]

On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 13:59 -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Let's not add this then. Better to have it be expanded.  Otherwise we
> would miss out on the opportunity to have a much better presentation
> on Dates than this one.  We can replace it with Davyd's linuxconf
> article.
Davyd's "article" is a bare-bones conference report.  If we had a
section "Conference Reports" or similar, it would be good.  But I don't
think it's main article material.

For these reasons, could we include the Dates article, or neither?  Then
we could get the release out the door.