Re: GIMPNet moderators/channel ops

[Andrea Veri <av gnome org>]

Gregory,

we have implemented nickserv/chanserv already [1], would you suggest
implementing channel protection directly through them? would you
personally prefer going for that kind of setup instead of having a
GNOME Operators team running the various channels?

Patrick, thanks for bringing this in to the list!


2016-01-04 17:24 GMT+01:00 Gregory Leblanc
<headmaster albus dumbledore gmail com>:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk
> <puiterwijk redhat com> wrote:
> [snip]
> > We wanted to have an on-ML discussion about channel OPs for GIMPNet, since we've had
> > some cases of spammers when the network-wide opers aren't around.
> [snip]
> > Another idea I can think of is to make it easier to find network OPs that are available.
> > Maybe have them determine a schedule of when which is available and publish this?
>
> Might it not be better to implement nickserv/chanserv?  They don't
> need to be as aggressive as the ones on freenode, but their code is
> probably robust and flexible enough for our use.
>      Greg
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-infrastructure mailing list
> gnome-infrastructure gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure



-- 
Cheers,

Andrea

Debian Developer,
Fedora / EPEL packager,
GNOME Infrastructure Team Coordinator,
GNOME Foundation Board of Directors Secretary,
GNOME Foundation Membership & Elections Committee Chairman

Homepage: http://www.gnome.org/~av