Re: Incorrect behaviour of GNOME infrastructure

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 07:43:01PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:12:22PM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Just letting you know that your systems are misconfigured - and are
not accepting legitimate DSN notices from our systems.
Thanks for your report!  I have CCed gnome-infrastructure who I think
is the appropriate recipient.
This is
resulting in unnecessary email being sent to our systems, when they
are not currently deliverable to their final recipient.

Right. I think this was done to prevent SPAM, but I don't fully know.

Please ask your sysadmins to fix their third-party DSN filters.

Hi Ben,

Hi Olav,

Can we get a bit more detail? I did setup some filtering on that but
that was a long time ago. Cannot recall the reason why though and it was
before we used Git. Please forward 1 notice to this email address.

I'm afraid these are generated by Postfix - will be a bit difficult to
grab a sample before it trashes it.
I do have these log entries though - hopefully they're helpful?

Jan  3 17:27:01 postbox postfix/cleanup[28465]: 65B0FA05FE:
message-id=<20160103172701 65B0FA05FE postbox kde org>
Jan  3 17:27:01 postbox postfix/qmgr[3865]: 65B0FA05FE: from=<>,
size=7029, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jan  3 17:27:01 postbox postfix/bounce[28663]: 17605B6E74: sender
non-delivery notification: 65B0FA05FE
Jan  3 17:27:04 postbox postfix/smtp[28671]: 65B0FA05FE:
to=<foundation-list-bounces gnome org>,[]:25, delay=2.7,
delays=0.09/0.01/1.4/1.2, dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host[] said: 550 5.7.1 no third-party DSNs
(in reply to end of DATA command))
Jan  3 17:27:04 postbox postfix/qmgr[3865]: 65B0FA05FE: removed

If you need more detail I can try and capture one.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]