Re: secondary DNS server

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 22:52 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:25:38PM -0600, Christer Edwards wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl> wrote:
> > >> > progress.gnome.org also works
> 
> > In any case, bind9 is running now on progress and is acting as a slave
> > to menubar. I see there are additional configured zones on other
> > servers, which I've commented out until those can be configured with
> > allow-transfer definitions for the new slave. Someone may need to
> > inform me where these other boxes are and who to contact for them.
> 
> If you restricted allow-transfer, you'll have to allow transfers from
> all our existing slaves. Recommend being careful before making such
> changes.
> 
> Further, the whois records should be updated (otherwise it will never
> know about the slave, unless badly cached).

Maybe we should just (nicely, with thanks!) ditch the other slaves? A
primary and secondary should be enough for our needs.

- Owen