Re: Git migration docs

On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:08 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On the kernel, for example, patches tend to be independent in the
> sense that each change is atomic and would be justified on its own
> accord; however, a patch series tends to lean toward achieving an
> aggregate objective. This scenario tends to apply to implementing new
> features that touches many pieces.

I guess this kind of workflow just doesn't match the projects I work on,
or how I work, though it seems to be very comfortable for other people.
I then wish there was some way to group commits together to say "these
are useful separately, but together they also achieve foo". Then I could
choose to just look at the big-picture stuff.

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]