Re: Any use for a new server?

[Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>]

Le jeudi 13 décembre 2007, à 20:45 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 08:42:23PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Le jeudi 13 décembre 2007, à 00:23 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:14:30PM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 22:12 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > 1.2GHz? seems slow (even as dual). Not sure if that would match with
> > > > > our needs.
> > > > 
> > > > Yep.  They're probably leftovers or something, so no customization, but
> > > > then again, it's freebies.
> > > 
> > > Talked to Owen. As buildslave it is probably ok, as it doesn't really
> > > matter how long it takes. Plus build is also IO. Need to check if there
> > > is space at Red Hat, etc. Also still wonder if online desktop has a use
> > > (Owen mentioned that these aren't beefy enough for online-desktop usage).
> > 
> > Ok. So far, no news from online-desktop on my side either, but I'll
> > write down somewhere that we're interested in one as a build slave.
> 
> One? My goal is at least 10 buildslaves for stable GNOME, then another
> 10 for unstable one (could be hosted on the same machine). Ideally
> spread across various distros. But of course I'd prefer those to be
> contributed externally so someone else does the sysadmin bit (this
> depends on some buildbot changes.. it needs to use one port).

Ah, well, then we'll grab everything we can ;-)

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.