Re: Window mail config changes
- From: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: bugzilla-maintainers gnome org, GNOME Infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>, GNOME sysadmin list <gnome-sysadmin gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Window mail config changes
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:57:37 +0200
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:38:13PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:02:47AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 10:41:04AM +0700, Ross Golder wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > I can't imagine anything will go awry, but I'm copying in the bugzilla
> > > > dudes so they know who to harass if anything stops working around about
> > > > now. In fact, if they can confirm/deny whether the rest of the virtual
> > > > addresses are still relevant or not, and if not I'll remove them:
> > > >
> > > > -- begin cut'n'paste --
> > > > unknown bugzilla gnome org unknown widget gnome org
> > >
> > > unknown bugzilla gnome org is the email address used for bugreports
> > > created by bug-buddy where the reporter doesn't have a
> > > bugzilla.gnome.org account. It shouldn't get any mail.
> > >
> > > I'll change this to unknown gnome bugs, probably tomorrow.
> >
> > Done. This can be removed from the configuration or sent to /dev/null.
>
> Isn't it better to use a valid black hole email message than an
> invalid address?
I like the invalid domain because it is more obvious that it is invalid
and bugzilla specific. When we used $product-maint bugzilla gnome org
people still tried to email those (every so often). That would hopefully
never happen with unknown b g o, but it still is more consistent with
the dummy accounts. Furthermore unknown@ is still used as the default
assignee for the general product.
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]