Re: Friends-of-GNOME database [Re: Modifying GNOME-About to count users]
- From: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome web <gnome-web-list gnome org>, GNOME Infrastructure <gnome-infrastructure gnome org>, "Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation" <director gnome org>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Friends-of-GNOME database [Re: Modifying GNOME-About to count users]
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:23:11 -0400
On 7/13/05, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote:
> I'm not really sure how it would handle event attendance .. maybe
> that somehow fits into the "activity log".
It is in their feature list, but I admit I haven't looked into that
aspect at all.
> Then there is the question of whether the foundation member database
> is the same thing or different... I guess you could imagine just
> entering foundation members into the contact database and adding
> a custom "is foundation member" field.
that is what I'd presumed. The CRM stuff seems to have the capability
to do this trivially.
> Do we have a requirements
> list for the foundation member database?
No formal one that I've seen. The big wishlist bit would be
integration with a voting system, which AFAICS is one thing that
civicspace would not offer us.
> [ It doesn't look like the CivicCRM relationship to the rest of
> Drupal is strong ... basically Drupal seems to just be used
> as the user database.
In fact I believe I saw that their roadmap indicates a plan to offer a
version which does not depend on Drupal.
> I think, like live.gnome.org or bugzilla, we'd want to try to keep this
> pretty well isolated from the rest of gnomeweb ... different login
> user different database password, etc. We could reuse the 'gnomeweb'
> group for granting sudo access to the user, however.
Agreed.
> The reason I'm advocating that, is just general distrust of
> the security of big piles of web code, and perhaps a bit more of
> PHP code. (there was a recent remote-code execution vulnerability that
> affected one of the dependencies of drupal:
> http://lwn.net/Vulnerabilities/142274/)
seems totally sane.
luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]