Re: String additions to 'nautilus.gnome-3-16'
- From: Carlos Soriano Sanchez <csoriano redhat com>
- To: Piotr Drąg <piotrdrag gmail com>
- Cc: csoriano gnome org, gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: String additions to 'nautilus.gnome-3-16'
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Hi,
Sorry for that, I though it was an old translation, but it's true we changed how we displayed
those items in 3.16.
Should I revert and then ask for string exception? Or just ask for string exception now?
Carlos Soriano
----- Original Message -----
| 2015-07-01 20:03 GMT+02:00 Debarshi Ray <rishi is lostca se>:
| > To be fair, this restores an old string and actually fixes what some
| > might consider a regression in 3.16.x. It should be possible to somehow
| > restore the old translations too.
| >
|
| This particular string (every character matters!) was never used in
| Nautilus (I've checked every version since 3.0). As you can see, it
| caused a regression in translation coverage for every language:
|
| https://l10n.gnome.org/module/nautilus/#gnome-3-16
|
| To make it worse, this string is very visible to the user.
|
| If you can restore the translations, then everything would be fine.
| I'm skeptical, though - you'd need to take care of proper mnemonics,
| capitalization etc, all of which vary greatly among languages.
|
| Please also note that string change fixing a regression has a very
| high chance of getting a quick approval. Especially if you promise to
| make a new release (let's say) a week from now, so translators have
| time to update their translations and can count on getting it in the
| next release.
|
| Best regards,
|
| --
| Piotr Drąg
| http://raven.fedorapeople.org/
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]