Re: Survey results (yay!)
- From: Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>
- To: gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Survey results (yay!)
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:11:41 +0100
El dj 28 de 10 de 2010 a les 22:54 +0200, en/na Petr Kovar va escriure:
> Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>, Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:11:16 +0200:
> > Hi!
> > I'm really proud (and shamed for the delay) to finally present to all of
> > you the first survey to our GNOME i18n community!
> > First of all, a BIG THANK YOU!! to all coordinators who replied 
> And above all, big thank you, Gil, for this magnificent work! It really
> uncovers a lot, and enables us to think about our project management &
> planning in some quite new ways. It was a great idea to conduct such a
> survey in the first place.
Actually I miserably fail to send the (for me, and I hope for lots of
teams also) most important point:
In the same way that there's gtk+ and gtk+-properties, i.e. two po files
for a single module, it would be extremely useful for translators if ALL
schemas were going to a different po file and thus having a double
effect on translators:
- know which strings are actually visible to the users
- reducing a lot  the number of strings to translate to reach the
 I want to gather some number to enforce my point before sending a
proposal (if as a gnome-i18n team agree on this) to the release team. If
anyone wants to spend some minutes getting this data would be lovely :)
> > Quick links:
> > - raw data: 
> > - ods with all the data gathered:   
> Not sure whether others have already done something like this, but I'll try
> to create some charts out from available data and post it on
> blogs.gnome.org to help spread the resulting work around a bit.
> Also, we've some nice data & charts from Andre's presentation at GUADEC
> 2010 as well.
> Petr Kovar
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
[ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
[en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
] [Thread Prev