> Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any
> updates? The original bug
> was
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada <
gforcada gnome org>
> wrote:
> Hi sysadmins.
>
> I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal
> made by the
> release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n
> mailing
> list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME
> infrastructure.
>
> In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the program
> that runs
> on
l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the web
> interface but
> is blocker is on your side.
>
> Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs regarding
> this
> topic?
>
> Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done yet? Not
> to blame!
> just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to fix the
> spots.
>
> In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language teams
> coordinators
> one of the more requested features for improving Damned-Lies
> was to get
> auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if anyone can
> fix that
> blocker be sure that your work will be hugely appreciated!
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz
> va
> escriure:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets
> reorganizations,
> > several people have expressed the proposal to install a
> Transifex
> > instance to replace Damned Lies.
> >
> > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not
> convinced
> > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities.
> However if we
> > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be
> positive.
> > I think the main objective would be to support (a)
> auto-commit in GNOME
> > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on sysadmin
> side) and (b)
> > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked branch for
> modules not
> > hosted in GNOME infrastructure.
> >
> > We need now some people to take care of this. Personally I
> currently
> > don't have the required time to dive into this issue.
> >
> > Here are some steps we could follow to go further:
> > * Find a team of people to take the job
> > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure
> > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
> > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?)
> > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Claude
>
> --
> gil forcada
>
> [ca]
guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
> [en]
guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
> bloc:
http://gil.badall.net
> planet:
http://planet.guifi.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-infrastructure mailing list
>
gnome-infrastructure gnome org
>
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
>
>
