Re: Transifex instance for GNOME

[Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>]

Alexandro: ping?

Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler:
> Alexandro Silva had been working on this.   Alexandro, do you have any
> updates?  The original bug
> was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Paul
> 
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>
> wrote:
>         Hi sysadmins.
>         
>         I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal
>         made by the
>         release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n
>         mailing
>         list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME
>         infrastructure.
>         
>         In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the program
>         that runs
>         on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the web
>         interface but
>         is blocker is on your side.
>         
>         Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs regarding
>         this
>         topic?
>         
>         Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done yet? Not
>         to blame!
>         just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to fix the
>         spots.
>         
>         In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language teams
>         coordinators
>         one of the more requested features for improving Damned-Lies
>         was to get
>         auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if anyone can
>         fix that
>         blocker be sure that your work will be hugely appreciated!
>         
>         Cheers,
>         
>         
>         El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz
>         va
>         escriure:
>         > Hi,
>         >
>         > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets
>         reorganizations,
>         > several people have expressed the proposal to install a
>         Transifex
>         > instance to replace Damned Lies.
>         >
>         > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not
>         convinced
>         > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities.
>         However if we
>         > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be
>         positive.
>         > I think the main objective would be to support (a)
>         auto-commit in GNOME
>         > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on sysadmin
>         side) and (b)
>         > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked branch for
>         modules not
>         > hosted in GNOME infrastructure.
>         >
>         > We need now some people to take care of this. Personally I
>         currently
>         > don't have the required time to dive into this issue.
>         >
>         > Here are some steps we could follow to go further:
>         > * Find a team of people to take the job
>         > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure
>         > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs
>         > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?)
>         > * Decide to switch (or not to switch)
>         >
>         > Thoughts?
>         >
>         > Claude
>         
>         --
>         gil forcada
>         
>         [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
>         [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
>         bloc: http://gil.badall.net
>         planet: http://planet.guifi.net
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         gnome-infrastructure mailing list
>         gnome-infrastructure gnome org
>         http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

-- 
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper