Re: Something wrong with bug-buddy doc?

[Petr Kovar <pmkovar gnome org>]

Hi!

Mario Blättermann <mariobl gnome org>, Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:22:56 +0100:

> Am Sonntag, den 19.12.2010, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Jorge González González:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > is there anything wrong with the bug buddy documentation?
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/bug-buddy/master/help/es
> 
> 
> There is no really documentation. In the Git tree I found a manpage
> only, and a naked manpage without any other stuff (appropriate
> Makefile.am and OMF file) cannot be parsed by the gnome-doc-utils. As
> far as I know, some explanations for bug-buddy are in the Desktop User
> Manual.
> 
> Recently, there appeared some other manuals in the Damned Lies which
> were also untranslatable yet. For gnome-pilot and genius I have added
> g-d-u support immediately, and the meld manual shouldn't be translated
> for the time being, after consulting the meld maintainer, because it is
> outdated. A new build system for meld will be implemented anyway next
> time, probably autotools or waf.
> 
> Why appears the non-existent manual of bug-buddy in D-L? No idea...
> Could be that Vertimus parses the Git content regularly. But there's
> nothing which resembles a DocBook or Mallard hierarchy. And I remember,
> in the last years a similar bug-buddy manual appeared several times in
> D-L and disappeared again some time later from it, also with zero
> translatable strings. A bug in the parser routines of Vertimus?

I went ahead and adjusted the appropriate settings for meld and bug-buddy.
>From the DL admin interface, it seems we can't keep documentation domain
set for a particular module branch or branches, but since gnome-2-24 has
been released long time ago and is officially unmaintained now, I think we
can live without the old stats.

Cheers,
Petr Kovar