Re: Put evolution-scalix in the Obsolete package



Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 à 13:37 +0100, Christian Kellner a écrit :
> Hi Claude,
> 
> Gren replied on the 22nd of October. Maybe you missed that. I am  
> attaching Gren's reply.

Oh, sorry, I missed the answer (maybe stalled in the moderation queue).
Hop, unobsoleted :-)

Claude

> On 26.10.2009, at 13:31, Claude Paroz wrote:
> 
> > Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 20:01 +0200, Christian Kellner a écrit :
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I quit working for Scalix quite a while ago and I have no real clue  
> >> if
> >> evolution-scalix is officially maintained by Scalix anymore. I am
> >> therefore cc'ing Gren Elliot from Scalix/Xandros fame.
> >
> > One week, no answer = moved to "Obsolete" release.
> >
> > Claude
> >
> >> On 19.10.2009, at 11:15, Andre Klapper wrote:
> >>
> >>> CC'ing maintainer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 20:22 -0200 schrieb Leonardo Ferreira
> >>> Fontenelle:
> >>>> Watching the commit log for the Scalix connector for Evolution, I  
> >>>> see
> >>>> that in the last 1 year and 4 months all commits were done by
> >>>> translators, except for two which were related to the .doap file.
> >>>> Besides, there was no response an i18n bug I reported 16 months  
> >>>> ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which makes me think: could the translation commits be avoiding the
> >>>> Git administrators to notice development is stalled?
> >>>
> >>> Why should git admins notice at all, and how?
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, I believe we should stop translating evolution-scalix, at
> >>>> least for now.
> 
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle <leonardof gnome org>
> >
> >
> 
-- 
www.2xlibre.net



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]