Re: Put evolution-scalix in the Obsolete package
- From: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- To: Christian Kellner <gicmo gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME Translation Project <gnome-i18n gnome org>, Gren Elliot <Gren Elliot scalix com>
- Subject: Re: Put evolution-scalix in the Obsolete package
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:24:31 +0100
Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 à 13:37 +0100, Christian Kellner a écrit :
> Hi Claude,
>
> Gren replied on the 22nd of October. Maybe you missed that. I am
> attaching Gren's reply.
Oh, sorry, I missed the answer (maybe stalled in the moderation queue).
Hop, unobsoleted :-)
Claude
> On 26.10.2009, at 13:31, Claude Paroz wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 20:01 +0200, Christian Kellner a écrit :
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> I quit working for Scalix quite a while ago and I have no real clue
> >> if
> >> evolution-scalix is officially maintained by Scalix anymore. I am
> >> therefore cc'ing Gren Elliot from Scalix/Xandros fame.
> >
> > One week, no answer = moved to "Obsolete" release.
> >
> > Claude
> >
> >> On 19.10.2009, at 11:15, Andre Klapper wrote:
> >>
> >>> CC'ing maintainer.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Sonntag, den 18.10.2009, 20:22 -0200 schrieb Leonardo Ferreira
> >>> Fontenelle:
> >>>> Watching the commit log for the Scalix connector for Evolution, I
> >>>> see
> >>>> that in the last 1 year and 4 months all commits were done by
> >>>> translators, except for two which were related to the .doap file.
> >>>> Besides, there was no response an i18n bug I reported 16 months
> >>>> ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which makes me think: could the translation commits be avoiding the
> >>>> Git administrators to notice development is stalled?
> >>>
> >>> Why should git admins notice at all, and how?
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, I believe we should stop translating evolution-scalix, at
> >>>> least for now.
>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle <leonardof gnome org>
> >
> >
>
--
www.2xlibre.net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]