Re: Vertimus: Upload for proofreading

[Gil Forcada <gforcada gnome org>]

Great work Stéphane!

I also would like to see #567394 fixed, and thus have some more arrows
in the diagram :)

Thanks a lot!


El ds 17 de 01 de 2009 a les 22:50 +0100, en/na Marcel Telka va
escriure:
> Hi Stéphane,
> 
> The picture looks very good. I would like to see few improvements:
> 
> 1. Identification what role will do what action (using colors, as you
> suggested, or otherwise). If #4 (see below) will be implemented this
> would be not required (maybe).
> 
> 2. I think all edges should be labeled. For example the one from
> "Proofreading" to "To Commit" is anonymous.
> 
> 3. There shouldn't be bidirectional edges. I think in our case each
> direction is describing different action. Two edges would be better,
> both labeled.
> 
> 4. The "Upload for proofreading" action is not clear from the picture
> (at least for me; I know, I am stupid). We probably need either text
> description of the process too, or flow diagram as an addition to this
> state diagram.
> 
> 5. It should be published somewhere :-).
> 
> Thanks a lot!
> 
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:26:53PM +0100, Stéphane Raimbault wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've just made a diagram to explain the current Vertimus workflow and the
> > used terms.
> > 
> > Stéphane
> > 
> > PS : if useful I could add some colors to detail actions by role
> > (translator, reviewer, committer).
> 

-- 
gil forcada

[ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer
[en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network
bloc: http://gil.badall.net