Re: freeze break request - WAS: Re: Help with strings for "solution" for desktop file "virus" problem
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, gnome-doc-list gnome org, gnome-i18n gnome org, Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: freeze break request - WAS: Re: Help with strings for "solution" for desktop file "virus" problem
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:00:27 +0100
On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 13:04 +0000, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 10:16 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> > >
> > > So, my suggestion:
> > >
> > > The application launcher "%s" has not been marked as trusted. If you do
> > > not know this application launcher's source, launching it may be unsafe.
> >
> > This looks good to me, can i have another string freeze approval please?
>
> Hmm, guess I've come to this party too late, but I do have one slight
> concern about the use of "Trusted". That term has a specific meaning on
> at least one GNOME-based secure desktop I'm aware of (Trusted Solaris--
> which is the only one I've used, but I wouldn't be surprised if it
> applied to others, too).
Hmm, what do you propose to use then? Using "Executable" in the UI
sounds pretty lame, its an implementation detail after all.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]