Re: PiTiVi back in (git.)gnome.org

[Edward Hervey <bilboed gmail com>]

On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 13:53 +0000, Simos wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Gintautas Miliauskas <gintas akl lt> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >>  We currently are hosted in git.pitivi.org, but thanks to owen's help,
> >> we now have a git repo in gnome.org also
> >> (http://git.gnome.org/cgit/pitivi/ ) which we will be synchronizing with
> >> the master repository on a regular basis.
> >
> > Which repository do you consider the "master"? svn.gnome.org or git.gnome.org?
> >
> > I am slightly annoyed by all this repository moving business. Look, if
> > you want to move, fine, but *delete your project from the old
> > repository* so that there is no confusion. You can always restore the
> > project later if you want; despite being old-school, Subversion does
> > allow that. There are hundreds of packages on svn.gnome.org, and
> > translators can't be expected to track the whims of every project.
> > Moreover, when they find out they have been spending time translating
> > obsolete strings, they tend to get a little frustrated.
> >
> > I am also puzzled by your statement that translations are "too
> > obsolete to backport". Obsolete? It's a PO file, you just merge it
> > with the new POT and it's done. Backport? If the translations are
> > already obsolete, where could one backport them?
> 
> In addition to these questions, I'll add a one more.
> The current situation with git.gnome.org is that any changes that take
> place there
> will get lost when the official migration happens.
> Has there been a change to this?

  That repository is a clean one, not a converted one. It will *NOT* get
lost during the conversion since it will not be converted (according to
Owen).
  The url I gave above IS the final one.

> 
> Simos