Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24



On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:24:11PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> I can understand this. On the other side, updating the current branch
> gives you the possibility to test your translations in a real distro
> (Fedora 9, Ubuntu Hardy, Foresight, ...)

Yes. That's true.

Other outcome from GNOME 2.23/2.24 listed at DL is just to see what is
our progress in GNOME 2.23/2.24.  Release early (add GNOME 2.23/2.24
stats early), release often (update the stats often). :-)

> 
> > Personally, I'd prefer to have development branch always listed at DL,
> > but I am also ok with waiting about a month...
> 
> This bug raises a similar concern:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415315

Yes, it is somewhat similar...
... but not the same.

My request is going to be implemented sooner. :-)


Howgh.

-- 
+-------------------------------------------+
| Marcel Telka   e-mail:   marcel telka sk  |
|                homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
|                jabber:   marcel jabber sk |
+-------------------------------------------+


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]