Re: Damned Lies and GNOME 2.24

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:38 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:14:40PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 22:09 +0100, Marcel Telka a écrit :
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > when are we going to add GNOME 2.24 to DL?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Marcel,
> > 
> > Generally, I'm waiting for the .1 release of the stable version. I don't
> > see much sense in tracking the development version before that.
> 
> Hi Claude,
> 
> it could make sense for teams with low translated percentage and/or low
> resources. They could not want to "waste" time updating two branches.

I can understand this. On the other side, updating the current branch
gives you the possibility to test your translations in a real distro
(Fedora 9, Ubuntu Hardy, Foresight, ...)

> Personally, I'd prefer to have development branch always listed at DL,
> but I am also ok with waiting about a month...

This bug raises a similar concern:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415315

Regards,

Claude