Re: kB, MB or KiB, MiB
- From: Germán Poó Caamaño <gpoo ubiobio cl>
- To: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- Cc: Daniel Nylander <info danielnylander se>, GNOME I18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: kB, MB or KiB, MiB
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 14:46:07 -0400
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 19:17 +0200, Daniel Nylander wrote:
>
> > You are correct, it's more correct but maybe not appropriate.
> > As I translator, I have started to notice that more and more
> > applications start to use this new convention. For the beginning I was a
> > bit negative but started to like it more and more.
>
> I think consistency is most important here. So it would probably be a
> good idea to bring this up on desktop-devel-list. If an agreement can be
> reached that applications should use the IEEE_1541 symbols, then it
> would be appropriate to file bug reports for this.
I remember it was discussed some years ago in gnome-network list[1], but
documentation team had a recommendation written by that days[2].
Anyway, the situation has changed since then. I agree we should use
IEEE 1541.
[1]
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-network-list/2003-December/msg00011.html
[2]
http://web.archive.org/web/20040603162403/http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/x14800.html
Regards,
--
Germ�Po�ama�oncepci� Chile
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]