Re: Gnome-system-tools and 2.18

[Claude Paroz <paroz email ch>]

Le jeudi 25 janvier 2007 �2:02 +0100, Carlos Garnacho a �it :
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 21:09 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 �1:54 +0100, Claude Paroz a �it :
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > > 
> > > Do you know if it'll still be the 2.14 version of g-s-t that will be 
> > > used for Gnome 2.18 ?
> > > Regards.
> > 
> > I dare insist on getting an answer to this, because it's still the 2.14
> > version that is referenced in progress.gnome.org in the 2.18 language
> > page...
> 
> Oops, sorry, this mail got unnoticed amongst all the spam :). The 2.17.x
> series of g-s-t are in development in SVN trunk, and there have been
> several releases in sync with the GNOME schedule, so effectively, GNOME
> 2.18 will use g-s-t 2.18.

Thank Carlos for this clarification. Now if someone could apply this
patch in damned-lies:

Index: releases.xml.in
===================================================================
--- releases.xml.in     (r�sion 201)
+++ releases.xml.in     (copie de travail)
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
       <module id="gnome-screensaver"/>
       <module id="gnome-session"/>
       <module id="gnome-system-monitor"/>
-      <module id="gnome-system-tools" branch="gnome-2-14"/>
+      <module id="gnome-system-tools"/>
       <module id="gnome-terminal"/>
       <module id="gnome-themes"/>
       <module id="gnome-user-docs"/>


> AFAICS the GNOME release announcements have been including info about
> g-s-t in their NEWS and the 2.17.x tarballs in the sources, I thought
> that the translators would have noticed that. Should I have told this to
> someone? Have I missed something? I was getting wierd to get so little
> translations lately :)

Translators could have noticed, but it's always better to be as explicit
as possible.
Thanks for your great work.

Claude