Re: on usage of non-ascii symbols




The ellipses at least is in virtually every Latin font. Since the glyph for this character is in the "Windows ANSI" character set, the "Macintosh Roman" character set and the old "Adobe Standard Encoding" it is safe to use even with old fonts that have < 256 glyphs, provided the font is correctly encoded.

- Chris

On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:07 +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

On 2/27/07, Leonardo Fontenelle <leo fontenelle gmail com> wrote:

Epiphany uses real ellipsis like this, and curly double quotation
marks (in opposition to the common, "vertical" one). Unicode gives us
a lot of unambiguous characters for situations like that, and many
people (ex. web standards people) think you should use them as often
as possible. I kind of agree with that, too, but as you said they are
hard to enter and most people don't like them that much. Recently I
talked to the rest of the pt_BR l10n team and we decided not to use
this "nice and hard" unicode chars.

Using such characters would be great if the font users are using
supports them. I'm certain Bitstream does but what if users use
another font that doesn't? (hey if pango can determine such situations
and auto convert to ascii alternatives.. i'm dreaming..)



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]