Re: l10n-status.gnome.org

["Raphael Higino" <phhigino gmail com>]

Hey, Leo.

On 9/16/06, Leonardo Fontenelle <leo fontenelle gmail com> wrote:
> I'm a little confuse about the statistics and the files available in
> l10n-status.gnome.org. Some of our translations were commited to the
> CVS, are shown in my interface (I'm already using GNOME 2.16 from
> Gentoo) but don't seem to exist judging from l-g-o. I've noticed that
> files /gnome-2.16/PO/PACKAGE.gnome-2-16.pt_BR.po also have a HEAD
> counterpart, but both seem to lack some translation that actually is
> shown in my desktop.
>
> Example: in GNOME games, the Minesweeper game has a "_Use \"Too many
> flags\" warning" message, which is untranslated in both HEAD and
> gnome-2-16 files, but I can see a "_Utilizar o aviso \"Demasiadas
> bandeiras\"" here.

I guess it's just the fallback mechanism playing tricks on you. As
there are no translations available for pt_BR, gettext uses pt or
pt_PT ones.

> I'm trying to review some translations (about compliance to standard
> translations) but I'm afraid my diff's won't be appliable.
>
> The following files were expected to be completely translated but
> l-g-o disagrees:
> - gdm2
> - gnome-games
> - gnome-volume-manager
> - gnopernicus
> - gok
> - gtksourceview
> - metacity

About this, I think someone (like me :-) might have forgotten to
commit in the right branches.

--
Raphael Higino