Re: lib* in status pages



El mar, 20 de 05 de 2003 a las 11:38, Christian Rose escribió:
> mån 2003-05-19 klockan 21.40 skrev Ole Laursen:
> > Since 2.2 appears to be dying now, I'm in the process of switching my
> > translation efforts towards 2.4.
> 
> Sounds like a wise idea.
> 
> 
> > libgnomeprint, libgnomeprintui,
> > libgtop and libwnck are in the desktop group. Shouldn't they be in the
> > developer-libs group instead
> 
> Not necessarily. There are and have been many libs in the desktop
> release that are just the dependencies of a few other applications in
> the desktop release (libgtop->procman, libwnck->metacity etc) but are
> not API or ABI stable and hence do not belong in the platform release,
> i.e. they don't belong in the list of stable libraries that third
> parties are supposed to use to build their own applications.
> 
> I'm not sure if this applies to all of these though. Remember that the
> 2.4 module list isn't finalized yet and changes are bound to happen. If
> you want to follow the discussions in the area, please subscribe to the
> desktop-devel list.
> 
> 
> > (which perhaps just should be called "libs")?
> 
> Perhaps Carlos can answer that one.

Hey, don't look at me :-P I just code the pages generation, just use
what you think it's better.

I only will suggest that we should follow the group that GNOME release
team designates to call each release (fifth-toe, desktop, etc..) This
way is better to know what you should translate before each release.

Cheers.




> 
> 
> Christian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC)
Linux Registered User #121232
mailto:carlos@pemas.net || mailto:carlos@gnome.org
http://carlos.pemas.net
Valencia - Spain

Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmadadigitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]