Re: Bugs related to string changes

[Danilo Segan <dsegan gmx net>]

уто 08 јул 2003 23:07:57 CEST — Christian Rose написа:

> Please also use the "string" keyword to classify the bug in the
> keyword field when reporting, and also use the "GNOMEVER2.3" keyword 
> if the issue is in a GNOME 2.3/2.4 module. That way we can find all 
> bugs related to message issues in the upcoming GNOME release much 
> easier buy simply searching for the keywords "GNOMEVER2.3" and 
> "string".
> 

Ok, there are a few bugs I already sent which don't contain the 
"string" keyword. I'll use it in the future.

> Please *do not* add gnome-i18n@gnome.org as cc: in the bug reports!

Ok.

> By adding the list address to the cc: field in Bugzilla bug reports,
> the list will get normally mail for every simple change or added 
> comment in the bug reports. There already are 221 bug reports with 
> the keywords "GNOMEVER2.3" and "string" in Bugzilla, and it's likely 
> to become even more.

Yes, I see. If we even add those bug reports which *don't* contain the 
keyword "string", it would be more ;-)

Here are the bugs which I have filed without using the keyword 
"string", and they relate to string additions or changes:

Balsa:
  - 116604 (plural forms),
  - 116603 (minor issues),
  - 116994 (fixed, adds "translator_credits" to the About box).

gnome-applets:
  - 116986 (plural forms in mail-check, I attached an untested 
patch,       anyone has any idea how to do this better?),
  - 116988 and 116989 (minor omissions in original strings, 
Daniel          Baeyens already submitted a patch, but it's still not 
commited).

Should I add keyword "string" to these gnome-applets bugs?

Cheers,
Danilo