Re: Anjuta modules

[Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>]

ons 2003-02-26 klockan 23.01 skrev Vincent van Adrighem:
> > If anjuta2 is some sort of fork/rewrite, then we should be careful
> > with it, and wait to see how things turn out before having translators
> > spend an awful lot of resources into it.
> 
> Well, anjuta2 was going to be anjuta 4 gnome2. A complete rewrite /
> merge with gIDE. As this is taking longer than expected, there were
> people wanting a gnome2 version of anjuta1. And that's why they both
> exist. The gnome2 port of anjuta is more important to the translators
> because that project is almost _stable_ and already usable. The anjuta2
> project doesn't seem to be that far.

Ah, thanks for the explanation.


> > So right now I'm of the strong opinion that we should probably only
> > include anjuta on the status pages (similar to what we already do with
> > rhythmbox) until the projects merge, development on one of them
> > stagnates, or one of them is renamed so that there isn't any name
> > confusion any longer.
> 
> That seems to be the best choice right now. Anjuta2 is not ready for
> primetime and anjuta1-gnome2 hasn't been given the translation-love it
> needs.
> 
> I've removed the anjuta2 module for now. The focus should be on
> anjuta1-gnome2.

Thanks.


Christian