Re: Anjuta modules



ons 2003-02-26 klockan 14.40 skrev Naba Kumar:
> > so it seems unnecessary to include anjuta on the 2.2 pages. We should
> > avoid redundant work and we shouldn't have translators spend time with
> > something that is a dead end.
>
> Actually, anjuta is being ported to GNOME2 actively. The faq is little
> old and has been updated. The gnome2 port of anjuta certainly requires
> translation.

So why do we need to translate both anjuta2 and anjuta?


Christian





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]