re: difficulties with Gnome Translation



El dom, 28-04-2002 a las 01:09, R.I.P. Deaddog escribió:
> On 27 Apr 2002, Christian Rose wrote:
> 
> > (*) Currently this isn't the case because for example the unstable
> > status pages don't just list the core GNOME 2.0 modules but also a lot
> > of non-core and non-gnome modules, but that's just a bug. I think we
> > need a seperate stable/extra and unstable/extra report. I'd really
> > appreciate Carlos' opinions on this.
> 
> Agreed. As I have said, this is just an internim solution, and we
> really need Carlos to decide. So I'll stop adding non-core apps
> into translation-status.xml, and open a new xml file to jot down
> all extra apps. If it's time to be useful in the future, the new
> xml file can always be merged into translation-status.xml or used
> seperately.
> 

Sorry, I cannot wait to answer :-)

First of all. WE are who decide how the status pages are, we are a team
;-), I'm the actual mantainer for status pages but I love your
suggestions && features request.

I prefer all modules in one page. It's more easy to look the
translations status but you are right, we should have a feature that
lets us see what things are at gnome core and which others are
"optional".

Work in progress. This night will be a nonstop one and I hope also a
really productive one ;-).

Please, don't stop to send me your ideas I will be here long time :-)
(also at irc.gnome.org, but please, if I'm not at the i18n channel, 
only if it's really urgent).

> Objection to this?
> -- 
> Abel Cheung
> GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
-- 
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
mailto:carlos.perello@hispalinux.es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain

Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]