Re: I18N spam part II -- "reviewed" po files
- From: Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>
- To: Fatih Demir <kabalak gmx net>
- Cc: GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: I18N spam part II -- "reviewed" po files
- Date: 21 Jul 2001 16:24:19 +0200
El d_ 21 Jul 2001 15:13:50 +0200, Fatih Demir escribi_
> I know I'd asked this before, but no answer is in my memory...
> the po files should be reviewed from another person for QA, right? That
> was a consense on i18n issues on GUADEC II I think (I wasn't there, so I
> judge from the papers etc.).
> I want to integrater this somehow into gtranslator now, but I would like
> to know how the review message part should look alike?
> /Me personally would await soemthing like this in the header comment:
> # Review: REVIEWER <EMAIL>, DATE.
I'm starting this QA at Spanish translations and I use a header like
It's perfect for me.
> If this is a common consense, I'll integrate the support of this header
> entry into gtranslator GUI. Is this fien with you all somehow?!
> If anyone is interested I'll tell my GUI ideas for this..
> PS: Shouldn't http://i18n.gnome.org be developed further? Is it a dead
> end or just a lack of time that causes it's useless-ness.
> kabalak / email@example.com / Fatih Demir
> `-GNOME / ICQ:64241161 / GSM: +491749787080
> `-Editor / vim
> `-Filemanager / VFU
> gnome-i18n mailing list
Carlos Perelló Marín
Valencia - Spain
] [Thread Prev