Re: I18N spam part II -- "reviewed" po files

[Carlos Perelló Marín <carlos gnome-db org>]

El d_ 21 Jul 2001 15:13:50 +0200, Fatih Demir escribi_
> I know I'd asked this before, but no answer is in my memory...
> 
> the po files should be reviewed from another person for QA, right? That
> was a consense on i18n issues on GUADEC II I think (I wasn't there, so I
> judge from the papers etc.).
> 
> I want to integrater this somehow into gtranslator now, but I would like
> to know how the review message part should look alike?
> 
> /Me personally would await soemthing like this in the header comment:
> # Review: REVIEWER <EMAIL>, DATE.


I'm starting this QA at Spanish translations and I use a header like
yours.

It's perfect for me.

> 
> If this is a common consense, I'll integrate the support of this header
> entry into gtranslator GUI. Is this fien with you all somehow?!
> 
> If anyone is interested I'll tell my GUI ideas for this..
> 
> PS: Shouldn't http://i18n.gnome.org be developed further? Is it a dead
> end or just a lack of time that causes it's useless-ness.
> --
> kabalak / kabalak@kabalak.net / Fatih Demir
> `-GNOME / ICQ:64241161 / GSM: +491749787080
>  `-Editor / vim
>   `-Filemanager / VFU
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
> 
--
Carlos Perelló Marín
mailto:carlos@gnome-db.org
mailto:carlos@hispalinux.es
http://www.gnome-db.org
http://www.Hispalinux.es
Valencia - Spain