Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas

Havoc Pennington wrote:

> I guess the hard thing to implement is "attaching" the schema name to
> a key; I don't know that this is required, maybe it isn't. As I said a
> /schemas/<key> convention is already encouraged by the GConf manual.
> I'm not clear on exactly what you're asking maybe...

I simply don't want to expose a special schema API to clients, thats all.

- Dietmar

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]