Re: Subversion migration schedule (cut-off Fri 18 Mar)

เมื่อ อา. 2006-02-12 เวลา 10:53 +0800, Davyd Madeley เขียนว่า:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 11:22:47PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Davyd Madeley">
> > 
> > > With that in mind, and since I couldn't find it on the wiki. I was
> > > wondering what reasons we have chosen to go with Subversion over other
> > > popular contenders.
> > 
> > Sucks less than CVS, won't take a lot of relearning, uses very similar model
> > and infrastructure, relatively easy migration, doesn't change our ability to
> > use other systems alongside it.
> > 
> > It's an easy, incremental shift that helps us out in the near term, without
> > getting in the way of testing/using other (more interesting) systems.
> I was looking for a somewhat more detailed analysis of strengths and
> weaknesses. If that doesn't exist, that's fine.

I expect it exists somewhere. Googling for 'subversion vs cvs' shows a
few results that may constitute the kind of analysis you're after. It's
not an essay I'm about to start writing :)


gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]