Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- From: Jon Cast <jcast ou edu>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: murrayc usa net, Joaquin Cuenca Abela <e98cuenc free fr>, Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, glade-devel ximian com, glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 11:21:29 -0600
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> wrote:
<snip>
> I do believe that handler stub generation is useful. I advocate
> improving it, not removing it.
> Dissatisfactor with the UI generation code is what started the
> discussion.
Right. But AFAIR, no effective argument has been advanced against the
UI generation code. Somewhat valid arguments have been advanced against
generating stubs, though---and these have been used in the overall
conversation. So, lest anyone lose sight of the fact that they apply
/only/ to stub generation, I thought I'd throw that out.
In any case, I'm curious what value you see in stub generation (over and
above prototype generation, which can go into a non-modifiable file in
C)?
Jon Cast
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]