Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation

[Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>]

On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 02:44, Jon Cast wrote:
> Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> wrote:
> > The only glade-generated code that an end-user should/would want to
> > modify IFAICS are the stubs (end-users might want to insert
> > implementations there).  But the generation of callback stub code is a
> > convenience feature.
> 
> Right.  In fact, there's no reason I can see to even generate them; the
> only code I'd want to keep is code I can copy from the header file
> anyway, and I don't think there's any reason to modify that.  So the
> argument is against auto-generating the handler stubs, not against
> auto-generating the UI creation code.

I do believe that handler stub generation is useful.  I advocate
improving it, not removing it.

Dissatisfactor with the UI generation code is what started the
discussion. 

- Bill
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Jon Cast
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
-- 
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers