Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- From: Jon Cast <jcast ou edu>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: murrayc usa net, Joaquin Cuenca Abela <e98cuenc free fr>, Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>, Gnome Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, glade-devel ximian com, glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Glade-devel] Re: glade code generation
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 20:44:45 -0600
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> wrote:
> The only glade-generated code that an end-user should/would want to
> modify IFAICS are the stubs (end-users might want to insert
> implementations there). But the generation of callback stub code is a
> convenience feature.
Right. In fact, there's no reason I can see to even generate them; the
only code I'd want to keep is code I can copy from the header file
anyway, and I don't think there's any reason to modify that. So the
argument is against auto-generating the handler stubs, not against
auto-generating the UI creation code.
<snip>
Jon Cast
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]