Re: more gnome 2 proposal

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Alex Graveley <alex ximian com> writes:
> 
> On 14 Mar 2001 16:12:38 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > 
> > Alex Graveley <alex ximian com> writes:
> > > 
> > > I honestly don't understand the point of this. Why tie ourselves to a C
> > > api, for the sole purpose of having it phased out? We should do it right
> > > the first time.
> > > 
> > 
> > The first time is over and done with. We already released the C APIs!
> 
> 
> Sorry to be confusing. I think I meant "everything from here on out, but
> not including everything already done." :-)
> 

OK, I don't really have a big problem with that. I don't intend to add
much in the way of API to GConf. I do need to continue supporting the
existing C API though.

Havoc

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers