Re: My vision of gnome-libs (was Re: GNOME 2.0 meeting summary)

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com> writes: 
> OK; although I think there should be two levels of this,
> GNOME_DISABLE_DEPRECATED and GNOME_ENABLE_COMPAT (where you have to
> explicitly ask for really old stuff). Havoc, woudl you mind posting
> the Gtk deprecation policy you posted on gtk-devel-list a while back
> so we can consider using a similar policy for gnome-libs?
> 

Well, we ended up simplifying it a lot. We now have two things:

 GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED - brackets stuff that has a replacement that 
                          should be used in new code instead. the 
                          deprecated stuff will be removed whenever 
                          we decide it's a good idea, no fixed policy.
      

 GTK_ENABLE_BROKEN - brackets actively buggy/broken stuff, like
                     GtkTree. This stuff will likely disappear
                     quickly.

So there's not really much of a policy, KISS.

Havoc



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers