Re: My vision of gnome-libs (was Re: GNOME 2.0 meeting summary)
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: George <jirka 5z com>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: My vision of gnome-libs (was Re: GNOME 2.0 meeting summary)
- Date: 20 Feb 2001 01:50:44 -0800
George <jirka 5z com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:44:44PM -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > Why is requiring a special define better than requiring linking
> > against libcompat? They sound pretty close to me. In fact, we could
> > set up pkgconfig to have a --enable-compat option which links against
> > the compat library and sets the compat define.
>
> Because if libgnome required gnome-config, everything would have to link
> against libcompat, that's why.
>
What I am saying is that all libgnome and libgnomeui stuff should be
moved over to GConf. gnome-libs should not use gnome-config
internally, because unless the system-wide settings are und GConf, we
miss the point of GConf.
- Maciej
_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]