Re: stupid gconf patch

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:

> "Mathieu Lacage" <mathieu eazel com> writes:
> > 
> > As far as I can tell, libxml always and is still installing its headers in 
> > includedir/gnome-xml/
> > 
> > BUT:
> > 
> > mathieu hackeur:~/src/scripts$ xml-config --cflags
> > -I/opt/gnome/gnome-xml/include/gnome-xml
> > 
> > This has been the case for all stable 1.x releases...
> > 
> 
> Is there any problem being caused by using gnome-xml/tree.h, etc.? 

Since libxml 1.8.8, the recommended way is <libxml/tree.h>. This makes the
code work with both libxml 1 and 2, but you should also do the other stuff
while you're at it.

> It makes me nervous to include names like "tree.h", "parse.h" -
> serious lack of namespacing there.

This is also wrong, don't know how this can work.

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers