Re: Reprise of the panel layout proposal
- From: "Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero" <famrom infernal-iceberg com>
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Reprise of the panel layout proposal
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:00:08 +0200
jjramsey_6x9eq42 yahoo com (2001-06-23 at 1343.30 -0700):
> The failsafe option is a good solution for when things
> actually go wrong with ~/.gnome/session (file
> corruption, permissions screw-up, whatnot). However,
My point was that currently it is not used by GDM. When users select
Failsafe, they get a plain X environment (cool!). At least in my
config (GDM 2.2.0).
> the problem being addressed is how to keep the user's
> own ignorance of the GUI from getting to the point
> where he or she seems stuck. Such a user might not
> know how to trigger the failsafe option, even if there
> is a easy GUI way of accessing it. Better to keep the
> user from screwing up in the first place. Thristian's
> more fine-grained scheme minimizes the number of core
> things that can't be removed, so even advanced users
> should be happy and may not even notice what isn't
> removable.
You will still find people that will not want your forced system. IE,
I do not use main menu in a panel (keybinding or MB3), nor logout nor
control center launcher (they come in the menu, and I already can
launch it). But do not worry, I will find ways to workaround your
limits, or just move to other system, it seems my doom.
GSR
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]