Re: The Help Men
- From: Tim Moore <tmoore tembel org>
- To: Bowie Poag <bjp primenet com>
- cc: Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: The Help Men
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:08:43 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 30 Jul 1998, Bowie Poag wrote:
>
> > John R Sheets <dusk@smsi-roman.com> wrote:
> > > Question:
> > >
> > > What should the behaviour of the Help menu item be if no help
> > > exists for an app? Should it be grayed out (and if so, how will
> > > it know of the help file's existence?)?
> >
> > the current style guide (see gnome.org) suggests that help ALWAYS has at
> > least one item: the about box.
> >
>
> Bad idea.
>
> About does not belong under Help, because it has nothing to do with the
> concept of "Help". Simply because no other suitable place can be
> immediately thought of for where to put it, doesnt mean that we should
> throw it under Help, IMHO. That would be just as illogical a move as if we
> were to throw it under Edit, or something equally uncalled-for.
>
> The final draft (again, after a fully formed document has been released,
> looked at, and subsequently revised by the public a gazillion times before
> it becomes a FINAL DRAFT) will likely propose a new addition to the
> standard gamut of "File / Edit / View / Options / Help / Preferences" ..
> For example, I see nothing wrong with:
>
> +-+---------------------------------------------+-+-+
> |O| Application |^|X|
> +=+=============================================+=+=+
> | 8' File Edit View Options Preferences |
> +---------------------------------------------------+
> | +- |
> | |\ |
> | \ |
> | Little Gnome Footprint |
>
> A simple little Gnome Footprint present in the menu bar of each apps
> window would do the trick nicely, at first thought. I'm open to
> suggestions. Even yours, Tom. ;) hee
>
> Bowie
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-gui-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]