Re: Self Documenting Interfaces
- From: "Dan Kaminsky" <effugas best com>
- To: "Preben Randhol" <randhol dusken4 samfundet ntnu no>
- Cc: <gnome-gui-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Self Documenting Interfaces
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 02:33:50 -0700
-----Original Message-----
From: Preben Randhol <randhol@dusken4.samfundet.ntnu.no>
To: Dan Kaminsky <effugas@best.com>
Date: Thursday, July 23, 1998 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Self Documenting Interfaces
>* "Dan Kaminsky" <effugas@best.com
>
>| Guided tours should be guided by the *app*. That's why I think GNOME
should
>
>Which makes a small app twice the size or more...
I'd gladly take a few extra K for useful documentation. And it's not
encapsulated in the app anyway.
>| put a high priority on voiced tours.
>
>OK so if I make a small program of about 60kb then I should put 100Mb
>of soundfiles there so that some lazy person can listen to the manual?
I'm gonna take back my claim that voicing tours is preferable. However, a
text-annotated visual tour of a program and what it can do *IS* a good
thing. There's no better way to learn an app than to watch it in use,
rewind, fast forward, etc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]