Re: actual proposal
- From: Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: actual proposal
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:47:03 +0200
Bowie Poag <bjp@primenet.com> wrote:
> > Why: Apart from consistency, you never know which windowmanager people
> > are using. They might even be using none at all (running X on an
> > older laptop for a single purpose often is done that way. for screen
> > real-estate reasons more than performance). Therefore, you should
> > never rely on external means to close popup-windows. So you need
> > to provide a means yourself and this has to be consistent with other
> > applications or the user will be hunting around for the close
> > button until frustration.
>
> "Close" is ambiguous. An [ OK ] button closes a window. So does a [
> Cancel ] button.
first of all, "Close" is not in the very least ambiguous. it does exactly
what it states - closing the popup-window. I do not think you can get much
clearer.
second, I pointed that out a few times by now, this is mostly just a
misunderstanding. read the next lines:
> > How: Every window that requires no interaction (dialogs are treated in
> > chapter X, item Y) has to have a single button labeled "Close".
see? this is for popup-windows only. anything that requires "Ok" and
"Cancel" buttons is a dialog by my terminology and is not subject to this at
all.
I really should have put this sentence in much earlier to make it clearer.
my bad.
> Unnecessary and unenforcable. Depending upon the context in which the
> pop-up appears, something either must be OK'ed, or Cancelled.
this is the same misunderstanding. an example: the "About..." popup. you do
not "ok" an about, do you? you don't cancel it either. same thing with error
messages - have you never wondered why you HAVE to hit "ok" in response to
"really bad error, I'll eat your disk now" ?
THESE are the cases I was talking about. the cases with (quote) "no
interaction", where you just need a way to get rid of the window after
reading its contents.
I do consider "ok'ing" or canceling something as an interaction, in case
that part was unclear.
--
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
-- Henry Spencer
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]