Re: actual proposal

[Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>]

Bowie Poag <bjp@primenet.com> wrote:
> B) Several people have pointed out that Tom's idea is fundementally
>    flawed (e.g. "close" being an ambiguous term which is better broken
>    down into discrete OK & Cancel choices).. Does the addition into
>    the guide reflect this?

actually, there is no flaw, just a bad choice of words that does not make
perfectly clear what I was talking about. I think this answers your other
questions as I hope this will be one of the modifications before it goes
into cvs.


-- 
Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
		-- Henry Spencer