re: word processors and spelling ( was Re: Why cluehunting ?)
- From: Soren Harward <soren cinternet net>
- To: Gleef <gleef capital net>
- cc: "Jesse D. Sightler" <jsight pair com>, Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>, gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: re: word processors and spelling ( was Re: Why cluehunting ?)
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 10:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Actually, I kinda like the "red hash marks" under a mispelled ;) word,
because I often screw them up. As long as the word processor isn't
obtrusive about it -- or worse, tries to fix the word -- I'm fine with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Soren Harward | Windows 95/98 DOES come
Internet Information Systems Administrator | with a tool to recover
Cinternet, Inc. | from Registry
Voice: 891-1228 soren@cinternet.net | corruption.
http://www.cinternet.net/~soren/ | It's called 'FDISK'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 22 Aug 1998, Gleef wrote:
>
>
>> Actually, things like this should be configurable, but default to what the
>> vast majority of users prefer.
>>
>> In the case of MS Word, this means that the lines should appear on spelling
>> errors, but definately not on grammer "errors".
>
>Incedentally, I was checking out the WordPerfect 8 for Linux demo (very
>pretty btw, but huge). It uses a red hashed underline for spelling
>errors, and a blueish hashed underline for grammar errors. Both of them
>can be turned off, of course.
>
>It also will "correct" the spelling of words as you type by default. I
>turned that off quick!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]